Archive for the ‘SEO’ Category

Big brands scale to the Lilliputian world of smart-phones.

To keep pace with the global consumer shift from computers to mobile smart phones with their miniature displays, branding has had to learn to think like a Lilliputian. All things small however, does not guarantee less expensive as we have Apple asking $1M for interactive engagement media on its iPhone. Their explanation is the user experience… advertisers should not have an exclusive window to their subscriber, but rather a shared engagement with the content.

One of every five consumers is using a smart-phone to make a branded purchasing decision. The small screen will be attracting growing numbers of transaction as device prices drop and current carrier contracts expire. Being able to present offers 24 hours a day coincidental to the consumers geo-location with GPS technology is a ticket to demographic Nirvana.

For there to be a mobile brand conversation icons et al have to be miniaturized. The 3G-4G consumers already know there is less functionality in a mobile app and web browsing is a richer content experience, but to be effective both must be consumer relevant, up to the minute and platform specific. The inherent functionality of the medium….phone, web site etc, needs to focus on the user experience, so a mobile version of a Web site is becoming a have to have rather than I will think about it option.

buy me, bring me, get me, take me, give me….if you want them to come back. Once again, branding is edging ever so much closer to sales promotion with bar code scanning and location aware proximity technology drawing them all together at the point of sale.

One caveat when creating your mobile marketplace…each platform; Apple, Android, Blackberry and Bada sees the code differently and each device sees that code differently.
Holding on too tight to your graphical standards could cost you your sanity unless you accept the idea that each consumer interaction is a one to one experience.

For a thought to have value, it must have weight

We may speak of the quality of the air we breathe, but what we actually dialog about are the component elements and compounds of air measured as particulates of matter carried about by it even though we use words like; sweet, warm, damp, salty, humid, musty, fowl, fragrant, rank or fresh to communicate our personal and shared experience of air.

Values for the weight of those particulates are expressed in the effect that they have on our bodies and environment because there is no commodity market for used sulfur dioxide.  In specific instances, the weigh of the impact by particulates upon us is so great that their existence can be converted into monetary values… both real and projected.

Isn’t it curious that an idea may only have value if it is shared like the air? And that sharing must have velocity to assure that the idea’s transmission is received by such significant numbers of minds as to be repeated without contamination of errant particulates in order for the author to be justly credited with the original thought?

Original ideas are not unlike the wind impacting us like zephyrs, breezes, tornadoes, gales, hurricanes and vortexes. Forces of emotional and intellectual thought so profound as to have sufficient weight to be expressed monetarily – or haven’t you downloaded a song lately? Did the words and music not have velocity – moving you to think, feel or dance?

So then, is the weight of a thought expressed by the demand of consumers to have access to it, or by the impact it has upon them or by the advertiser willing to pay for the privilege underwriting the publishing and distribution of the thought?

Or – could it be that an original thought has an intrinsic valuation – published or not – copyright protected or not.  Might it not be more appropriate to value a thought on the weight of its impact?

The most important thing in communication is hearing what isn’t being said.

It might be difficult not to believe an entrepreneur who has convinced thousands of investors to put their money behind an untried and untested innovation that their marketing directives will be successful. But experience has shown me that technological genius and capital raising acumen are not assurances for mass marketing mojo unless the image you are seeing in the mirror is Steve Jobs.

For everyone else, I recommend investing in marketplace research of both the wholesale and retail side of distribution as the euphemism of mine field will actually prove to be an understatement. Ask consumers for their opinions, watch for their unspoken reactions, challenge their willingness to please and respond to their aspersions with an open mind. With that input draft a psycho-demographic profile and challenge a variety marketing and media consultants to develop media plans and schedules. Keep in mind that your campaign must be in sync with product production, distribution cycles and media timetables – None of which are probably in lock step with your competitors, bankers or investor interests.

The new online social marketplace has presented communication professionals with unique opportunities for both free and paid impressions. The debate between CPM and CPC metrics hould not be taken as the only measures of success… brand recall isn’t SEO and unique visitors are not a measure of a customer’s willingness to buy.  More importantly, learning the differences will not suffice having practical experience. Being bloodied in battle and hailed as a victor keeps one both human and humble.

Clicks and keywords are monetary metrics not brand credentials

It wasn’t that long ago that advertisers invested in producing truly creative print ads, radio spots and TV commercials to engage consumers in a dialog with product marketers and their brands. So artful were these efforts that the Museum of Modern Art built a collection of the best examples.

More recently it was learned that the once presumed family friendly social networks; Facebook, MySpace, Google et al, have been aggregating the personal ID data from site visits and sharing it with their advertising media networks to effectuate higher click-thru rates.

Besides the unethical business practice what should concern all of us is the shift from earning the hearts and minds of consumers through relevant content exchanges to spying on consumer activities in an attempt to ambush their attention as they navigate the net.

Worse still is the thinking that a click is a value metric in building a brand franchise with a consumer. The click doesn’t actually measure a positive or negative brand recall, but it does serve as an accounting methodology.

Roy Grace, creative director of “Spicy Meatballs”– “good advertising is achieved by cooperative effort between agency talent and clients with courage and intelligence. For those that know there are short cuts, but choose not to take them — I’m with you.

Content is its own virus

So much of our current marketing energies are focused on abetting the ability of a prospect to locate a brand online that the “solutions” which consumers are actually searching for may be overlooked in an effort to execute optimization.

Solutions of real value are most often found within current, relevant content that addresses the answers to the; who, what, where and why questions… the DNA of a successful brand.

Truth be told, it is easier to optimize a site than it is to imbue the essence of a brand with relevance, substance, character, merit, functionality, purpose, resolve and then affirm those key brand terms with performance guarantees.

 Invest in the underlying values and the credibility of a brand will become the subject of peer conversations both on and offline.

The conversion of an interest to an outcome

We are sponsors of a culture driven by virtual conveniences craving irrefutable credentials to support what appear to be its impromptu choices.

Appearances can be deceiving though as the traditional exemplars of “branding” have evolved through the socialization of marketing. Personal networks now endorse the role of the consumer as the publisher of its peer to peer messaging. While the brand continues to be perceived as a personal credential, the consumer, rather than the brand has emerged as the “qualified” expert.

The “why” answer is a question of trust. The consumer is skeptical of media messages and has been empowered with the tools to verify the credentials of a product by communicating with a global community of peer users. Managing that interpersonal correspondence can present unanticipated consequences – both positive and negative.

Today, marketers need to actively participate in the conversations of the peer community and do so openly to be compliant with FTC guidelines in the interest of a truthful outcome.

Viral marketing is velocity marketing

Digital viral marketing is the uniquely organic process of a customer connecting to a potential customer linking their social networks to share their online discoveries and experiences. The promotional benefits of viral marketing are many fold: little or  no media cost, high velocity of correspondence, peer recommendations, multiple linking sources which raise search rankings, exponential awareness which draws the attention of the press accelerating “buzz” and increases the opportunity to convert larger numbers of potential customers to purchasers – ultimately building a brand franchise in real time.

The magnets for engaging site visitors are opportunities to participate in; surveys, questionnaires, entertainment and relevant interactive content with a reward for sharing information about your product thus making them brand ambassadors.
           
Unlike traditional brand marketing which typically can take years, the metrics for success are the dollars spent to engage and the conversion to sales measured in real time.

Let them do the talking, but listen intently.

Traditional brands may be hesitant to accept this paradigm, but web analytics show us that consumer generated content posted to sites dominates the brand related content space over the content created by the marketers of brands themselves. In fact, “77% of YouTube Twitter and Facebook listings that appeared for brand searches were created by someone other than the marketer.”

Marketers have come to learn that consumer collaboration creates immersive, shareable experiences. Peer sharing is essential if a product is to connect virally with consumers. While the acceleration of content distribution can be exhilarating and a great savings over paid media, the quality and tone of the user messages may not always be positive to the brand.

In anticipation of potentially negative correspondence, it is critical for brand marketers to have a plan and the means to address the situation immediately. Correspond with the detractors, generate new content to engage users to provide positive testimonials, stimulate sharing, but do not ignore those little nagging voices as they can become screams.

High frequency brand marketing may have seen its last birthday

The 2010 Content Marketing Spending Survey conducted by Junta42*, and published by HubSpot, shows that marketing with content is on the rise.

In fact, 33% of the typical marketing budget of all companies surveyed focuses on marketing with content – A rise of 11% over 2009.

Curiously, enterprises with less than one hundred employees spent 40% of their marketing dollars on communication endeavors with content compared with18% by businesses of more than one hundred employees.

An engaging, relevant content philosophy may be replacing a legacy of slogan and jingle psychology – prospect relationships and retaining customers by touching their minds…a novel thought…respect the customer.

“When” and “how much” used to be the only question asked of marketers. Today the “how” question is getting a lot more attention.

A question making a statement

Success in business will depend in no small part to the means and methods employed to define products and services, attract business, conduct transactions and maintain customer relations. Those seeking instructive insights from the web are looking for less intuitive “why we are” brand posturing content and more evidentiary “how we did it” results.  

The “how we did it” however, may not always be so easy to speak of considering the proprietary conduct of each business and the assumption of privacy owing to binding non-disclosure agreements. Yet the tools used are relatively standard. What continues to be unique is the artful way they are deployed and how they leverage what is offered. Today, the evidence of a brand can no longer just be its recall or its relative value, but rather its productivity and that is always more relevant and therefore “persuasive” content.

We may ask ourselves if engaging in content specific conversation and debate is either marketing or sales… MindGang knows that there was never a difference between the disciplines from a bottom line perspective… only the title on the business cards.

Return top